EVOLUTION - the biggest cover-up since ROSWELL
In 1981 22 British Museum biologists said 'Evolution is not a fact' yet still today we are being bombarded by evolution as the only credible way man came to be on the earth. It is a fact that more scientists today believe evolution as a theory it can no longer be taken seriously. So why are we still being forced fed this 'theory'.
The answer is Money - There are too many people making too much money in careers dedicated to evolution. It is a science that has not evolved with evidence, it hides what it does not like, destroys what it fears and invents what it needs. It has the clout to silence the truth, and anyone who dares to question.
Fossil evidence actually disproves evolution as a credible theory. - Click here!
There is still no fossil evidence to fill in the gaps between one order of life and another. If you look at the data, each line represents a creature in the fossil record and shows the period it was/is extant. The time scale is a view shared by the majority of paleontologists and the evidence shows no link fossils between the main orders of life, so the supposed evolutionary branches have been omitted. The fossil evidence shows SUDDEN appearances of each order of life, not gradual. Any links reputed to be links are separate types of animals which can be traced in their form back, overlapping any such gap period. The answer is not to look at more fossils, this has been done the answer is to look at the evidence stacking up every day, and say, what does it tell us.
A problem evolutionists can't explain is symbiosis.
When it comes to symbiosis (def. an interaction between two different organisms living in close physical association, usually to the advantage of both parties.) evolutionists go quiet because they can not explain why in the fossil records insects appear at the same time as flowers, which needed them for pollination. such flowers could not propagate even for one season if the insects were not there. The flowers would have died without the insects. There are also the total lack of insect fossils where wings are beginning to grow. Flying insects appeared at the same time as non-flying, fully functional in what ever form they are in now.
One form of life can not change into another.
The theory of evolution by natural selection, which is the environment causing mutation, gene drift etc on a specific species, seemed to appeal to certain scientists, as it precluded the need for thought. However, no genetic experiment so far is able to indicate how a major new creature (eg flying insects and birds) can be produced. Natural selection can only produce a limited range of adjustments for survival in a changing environment. Darwin thought traits attained in life could be passed to their offspring. but genetics has proven that only characteristics in the genes are inherited.
There are small variations within a type of animal to adjust to the changing environment, but it still remains the same species. The dog for instance has many types and physical characteristics, long hair, short, tall legs, short, but all are still dogs. According to the Hardy-Weinburgh law there are only 16 possible variants of genetic characteristics at each fertilization. That is because the inheritance instructions are carried o two ribbons in each sex, making four for the two sexes. Then for each gene, there are two dominant characteristics, two weak, and one strong and one weak. This allows for 16 variations but they all remain one and the same species. This is what causes different races in man, eg color and racial shapes. All minor variations in the species.
Apes are our ancestor?. - Click here!
Apes are the favorite animal to be called our ancestors this assumption is based entirely on the fact that they look like us. There is no fossil evidence that we evolved from them. There are no fossil skeletons to prove that the stooped ape like man existed it was invented to fit a pattern. Museums have inserted skulls in their displays of the evolution of man 'in the interests of completeness' not scientific fact. Similarity is not a scientific process it is a carnival attraction and crowd puller. The problem with the ape man is a human skeleton in the basement of the British Museum of Natural History. This fossil was dug out of the lower Miocene deposits of Grande, part of the Caribbean Island of Guadeloupe. it still lies embedded in a two ton block of limestone, which is harder than marble. The skeleton was embedded while the lime stone was still fluid and the bones have not decayed when burial occurred. The bones are therefore the same age as the rock.
Miocene sediments are reckoned to date from 12 to 25 million years ago, so this lower Miocene human predates ALL its ancestors. The Museum has been in possession of the specimen since 1812 and was displayed until Darwinism took hold and the skeleton became an embarrassment. It was not the only specimen found but unfortunately seems to be the only one left in existence that we know of. But for how long?.
Darwin's black box.
'If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely breakdown' - Charles Darwin, The Origin of the Species. In 1966 a book was published in the USA by a biochemist called Michael J Behe. The book is called 'Darwin's Black Box'. A black box is scientific shorthand for something you know nothing about except that it works. To Darwin the structure of a cell was a black box. however for more than 40 years the box has been opened and studied by molecular biologists and biochemists. Behe's trademark is a simple mousetrap. Remove one piece of the trap and it stops working. The mousetrap can not evolve from something simpler. In other words it was designed and built. The mousetra is as simple as it gets. It did not evolve from its component parts. It is a 'system of irreducible complexity'. The cell is full of irreducibly complex systems (Irreducible= that which can not be reduced or simplified). Behe did not discover this, it has been common knowledge for years. Scientists have always assumed that sooner or later they would be able to show how these systems evolved. They haven't!. Behe has done 2 things in his book. Firstly, he explained the boi-molecular systems in the cell and shown that they are irreducibly complex. They can not be made any simpler without destroying them. Secondly, he checked the records to see if there was any attempt to explain the systems by evolution. NO ONE has come up with an answer.
Behe is not alone in his criticisms of Darwinism, there is a growing unrest amongst many scientific groups, questioning the validity of evolution and the lack of interest in looking for any other credible theory. At present only the few are speaking out, but they are being persecuted on a scale you would think unimaginable for so-called educated intellectuals. Such is the embarrassment high profile scientists are heading for that they are going to extreme lengths to keep quiet the truth regarding the lie called Evolution. 'The watcher' found out that many scientists hope to be dead and buried long before the truth has to come out. If we don't start to question now we will have another Roswell, where all the facts will get buried under mountains of red tape and burocracy. The BBC is right up at the forefront of this deception, producing program pushing the lie.
IT'S TIME WE HAD THE FACTS, START ASKING!
FOSSIL FUEL - The fuel that fuels Evolutionists!
The BBC recently put a documentary style series on the TV tracing the life and evolution of the dinosaurs. So detailed is the program that you would think someone had actually been there, and was now recounting their experience. However some people are now beginning to ask questions, how do they know that? who said they did that? All questions that beg an answer, and all questions that should have been addressed before going into production of this type of program.
Some would say, does it matter?, the answer to that is yes! British natural history documentaries are known the world over for their detailed and truthful content. They are always well researched and put over in a clear and easy to understand way. They tend not to be politically biased and keep away from any controversy. Unfortunately over the last few years the BBC has strayed ever deeper into the realms of theory, which in itself is not bad. But, they have portrayed the results as fact. This is wrong and I refer to the ever increasing production of EVOLUTION based natural History program.
*Kansas, USA, deletes reference to Evolution...
Program such as 'life on earth' and 'The body' series all promote the THEORY of evolution as fact. They place traits in our present day existence down to periods of our ancestral life forms. They use Fossils as a major part of this hypothesis, and yet half of the fossil evidence has not yet been discovered. Darwin based his theory on the premise that fossil evidence would be found, because he thought the facts at hand pointed in a particular direction. We know know they didn't.
The BBC's response to the use of evolution is that, evolution is the theory that everyone believes in, as the truth. More scientists believe in evolution therefore this must be reflected in their program.
There are many books on the market but this one by
Dr E.K Victor Pearce is a very good one to read. If you want to find out what science really says about
evolution. Victor Pearce is a scientist, archaeologist and theologian so he knows what he is talking about
and what is more important, he isn't afraid to tell people. This is the first in a series of his 'Evidence for truth' books,
Archaeology and Prophecy being the other two.
He points out in his book that far from disproving the Bible science is actually backing up the Bible. Many discoveries within
the archaeological and anthropological disciplines are in direct agreement with the scriptures.
As with any book, always remember that the Bible is the truth and not open to interpretation to fit man's idea of truth.
Click here for *20 Questions for an Evolutionist.
Why are we constantly being fed this 'theory' at the cost of all others. Even if you don't believe in God, you shouldn't be content with a lie. It was Sherlock Holmes that said, when you have eliminated the obvious, what ever you have left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Scientists are slowly coming to the realization that the Bible is not just a religious story book.
Other sites to have a look at which reveal the lie; evolution are :
*Center for Scientific Creation
*The Revolution against Evolution
Don't let them make a 
out of you!